Unconditional do_probe_raise() in probe_pt() #4183
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If
Z_RAISE_BETWEEN_PROBINGS
is null or undefined the probe is currently not raised byhome_offset[Z_AXIS]
andzprobe_zoffset
. But when the smallest bit different from 0 it is.If an undefined
Z_RAISE_BETWEEN_PROBINGS
expands to 0 (and it does) this is the solution.A similar asymmetry exists with the newly introduced 'short-cut' in
G28
- but it's the rise before anything is probed - so should not make a difference.This asymmetry likely causes the effects in #4177